---

All the problems in forex short-term trading,
Have answers here!
All the troubles in forex long-term investment,
Have echoes here!
All the psychological doubts in forex investment,
Have empathy here!

---

In the realm of two-way foreign exchange (FX) trading, Chinese citizens wishing to engage in professional FX investment face a reality far more complex and daunting than it appears on the surface.

---

First, from a regulatory policy perspective, China currently explicitly prohibits individuals from engaging in leveraged FX margin trading. This means that there are no legally licensed FX brokers operating within the country; consequently, investors are entirely unable to access compliant trading channels or secure legal protection domestically. This regulatory barrier fundamentally severs the path for Chinese citizens to conveniently participate in the global FX market, compelling all prospective investors in this field to turn overseas for solutions—a pivot that is itself fraught with numerous obstacles.
Currency exchange controls constitute the first insurmountable hurdle. Under current foreign exchange administration regulations, each Chinese citizen is granted an annual "facilitated" quota for purchasing foreign currency amounting to only US$50,000. For investors requiring large-scale, professional-grade FX trading capabilities, this quota is clearly woefully inadequate. Even if the issue of capital scale is temporarily resolved through methods such as splitting purchases across multiple accounts, the subsequent process of transferring funds out of the country remains riddled with difficulties. Even more vexing is the fact that major global FX brokers—driven by compliance risk considerations—generally impose restrictions on opening accounts for residents of mainland China. Even in instances where individual brokers do accept applications, they often require investors to provide documentation proving overseas residency or tax residency status, thereby further raising the barrier to entry.
Assuming an investor manages to overcome the aforementioned difficulties and successfully opens a trading account with an overseas broker, the issue of fund transfers immediately presents itself. Since FX brokers typically do not accept direct wire transfers from banks in mainland China, investors must first open an overseas bank account to serve as an intermediary hub for their funds; the nearest and most viable option for this purpose is Hong Kong. However, opening a bank account in Hong Kong has become anything but easy in recent years. Driven by anti-money laundering (AML) compliance pressures, banks have significantly tightened their scrutiny of account applications from mainland clients. Applicants are often required to schedule appointments in advance and provide detailed proof of the source of funds, proof of address, and a compelling justification for the intended use of the account; it is not uncommon for applicants to be rejected even after making multiple arduous trips back and forth. The entire process involves multiple stages—including cross-border travel, document preparation, bank interviews, and account maintenance—entailing substantial costs in terms of time, money, and mental energy. Meanwhile, a comparison with the domestic stock market’s investment environment serves to underscore the sense of helplessness driving Chinese citizens to seek offshore asset allocation. Since its inception, China’s stock market has been tasked primarily with the core function of facilitating corporate financing; this institutional DNA has resulted in a market characterized—over the long term—by a heavy emphasis on fundraising and a relative disregard for investor returns. Numerous listed companies are keen to continuously extract capital from the market through IPOs, private placements, and rights issues, yet they remain reluctant to provide shareholders with stable, substantial cash dividends. Concurrently, major shareholders frequently engage in share reductions to cash out; delisting mechanisms remain largely ineffective; speculation on "shell companies" persists despite repeated bans; and the phenomenon of "bad money driving out good" has become a chronic feature of the market landscape. Within such a market ecosystem, the fundamental analysis frameworks essential for value investing are difficult to apply effectively; the credibility of financial statements is frequently called into question; and retail investors, if even slightly inattentive, risk stumbling upon major pitfalls—such as financial fraud or sudden delistings—that can wipe out years of accumulated savings in an instant.
The structural characteristics of the market’s participants also dictate that its price-discovery mechanism leans more toward speculative gamesmanship than genuine investment. Retail investors, speculative "hot money," and quantitative funds collectively constitute the primary trading forces in the A-share market. Investment behaviors are highly homogenized, centering almost exclusively on concept-driven speculation, thematic chasing, and the rotation of market "hot spots." Market trends shift rapidly, stock prices fluctuate violently, and investors who attempt to hold high-quality assets for the long term often find themselves trapped in the unenviable position of "holding the bag" at peak valuations. Even professional institutional investors struggle to remain immune within the current performance evaluation system; public fund managers face intense pressure regarding short-term performance rankings, compelling them to join the herd in chasing rallies and cutting losses—leaving little fertile ground for the philosophy of value investing to take root.
Precisely for these reasons, some investors—those possessing the capacity to identify risks and a desire for asset diversification—have turned their gaze toward foreign markets, hoping to discover opportunities within more mature and transparent global environments. However, as previously noted, this path demands that investors possess exceptional execution capabilities and a high degree of resilience in the face of setbacks. They must be willing to invest substantial time in researching overseas regulatory policies, tax compliance requirements, and cross-border capital transfer protocols. Furthermore, they must bear the costs associated with international travel, opening overseas bank accounts, account maintenance fees, and potential legal consultation expenses—all while maintaining a high level of patience and meticulous attention to detail throughout the entire process. A single oversight at any stage could result in all their efforts coming to naught. It can be said that for Chinese citizens who genuinely aspire to achieve success in the field of forex investment, the moment they successfully open an account and complete their first trade marks merely the first step in a long and arduous journey; the subsequent challenges—including continuous learning, risk management, tax reporting, and capital repatriation—remain formidable.

Within the two-way trading mechanism of forex investment, a phenomenon worthy of deep reflection is this: many traders who possess profound expertise in technical analysis often find themselves trapped in a predicament of "armchair trading"—lacking true practical command of the market. Consequently, the moment they adopt a heavy-position strategy, they become highly susceptible to incurring massive losses.

---

A close examination of cases involving significant financial losses reveals that the victims are, ironically, often drawn from the very group that prides itself on its technical mastery. The logic underlying this phenomenon is that the more sophisticated a trader's technical skills become, the more prone they are to developing overconfidence regarding specific market trends. They mistakenly conflate probabilistic advantages with absolute certainty, thereby becoming convinced that a particular trade is guaranteed to yield a profit. However, this mindset—this pursuit of "guaranteed returns"—fundamentally contradicts the core principle of the forex market: its inherent uncertainty.
When traders place excessive reliance on technical indicators while disregarding the market's inherent randomness and unpredictability, they are, in effect, pitting their own subjective sense of certainty against the objective chaos of the market. The deeper their technical expertise, the more likely this cognitive bias is to distance them from the true underlying dynamics of market behavior—ultimately leading them to launch heavy-position attacks in the wrong direction, thereby precipitating financial disaster.
Ultimately, enduring success in any investment arena stems not from a blind idolatry of technical methods or a futile quest for absolute certainty, but rather from the inevitable outcome of strictly respecting and aligning oneself with the fundamental law of market uncertainty.

In the two-way trading environment of the forex market, investors participating in trading activities should approach the various traditional maxims and aphorisms circulating within the trading community with caution and prudence; they must refrain from blindly believing in or mechanically applying these sayings without critical discernment.

---

These long-standing investment maxims are, for the most part, pearls of wisdom distilled by industry veterans from years of practical trading experience. They encapsulate the veterans' understanding of the market environment, price fluctuation patterns, and trading logic prevalent in their time; within specific historical market contexts, they indeed offered investors valuable references and guidance for their trading activities.
However, the market environment is in a state of perpetual flux; factors influencing exchange rate fluctuations, the composition of market participants, and the speed of information dissemination are constantly evolving and upgrading. Consequently, traditional maxims must also be adjusted and refined in tandem with the progression of the times and shifts in the market—one cannot simply cling rigidly to established conventions. Trading maxims formulated a century ago were constrained by the market conditions, information access channels, and trading tools available at the time; in today's highly complex and rapidly changing foreign exchange market, their applicability and instructive value have diminished significantly. Indeed, some of these maxims may even mislead investors' trading decisions, thereby triggering avoidable financial losses.
Even if a few traditional maxims still retain some relevance in the current market landscape, they inherently lack absolute certainty. Rather than offering precise predictions, they serve merely as broad generalizations or summaries of certain market probabilities; they cannot accurately forecast the direction, magnitude, or rhythm of every exchange rate fluctuation, nor should they be treated as the sole basis for trading decisions. The essence of foreign exchange trading lies in the ability to flexibly adapt one's operational strategies in response to real-time market conditions. If investors place excessive faith in maxims—mechanically adhering to fixed patterns while disregarding dynamic market shifts and the unique nuances of their own trading situations—they risk falling into trading pitfalls. Such errors in execution can ultimately compromise investment returns and even result in financial losses. Take, for instance, the most well-known investment maxim in the market: "Cut your losses short, let your profits run." Against the backdrop of today's highly advanced internet technology—where market information of all kinds is not merely abundant but often overwhelming—it has become exceedingly difficult for price trends in the forex market to exhibit prolonged, rapid, and unidirectional movements. In the vast majority of cases, exchange rates tend to fluctuate slowly and extend gradually within a consolidation range. Consequently, during actual trading, investors almost never encounter a phase consisting solely of unrealized profits; rather, they more frequently face a symbiotic state where unrealized losses and unrealized profits alternate and coexist. Every minor uptick in exchange rates may be accompanied by a pullback, just as every minor dip may be followed by a rebound. This current market reality renders the maxim "cut your losses short, let your profits run" difficult to apply effectively in practice. If one attempts to execute trades strictly according to this rule, the result is often either missing out on subsequent profit opportunities during pullbacks by cutting losses too prematurely, or suffering a "giveback" of profits—or even seeing gains turn into losses—by blindly holding onto winning positions. This outcome runs counter to the very spirit of the maxim itself and hinders an investor's ability to achieve stable, robust returns.

In the realm of two-way trading within the forex market, a mature, long-term trader must possess a profound understanding of the fundamental conflict between the inherent nature of market information and the limitations of their own cognitive capacity.

---

The daily flow of information generated by the global forex market is as vast as the ocean—ranging from Federal Reserve interest rate decisions to European Central Bank monetary policy statements, and from geopolitical developments in the Asia-Pacific region to capital flow data in emerging markets. These seemingly critical news events collectively constitute an infinitely expanding information universe. However, for any individual trader—regardless of how unhindered their information channels may be or how sophisticated their analytical tools are—the information they can genuinely access and effectively process remains, invariably, a limited and fragmented subset. Attempting to interpret and forecast the infinitely complex dynamics of the market using only these limited—and often lagging—fragments of information is, in essence, a cognitive exercise in futility—akin to "climbing a tree to catch a fish." The inevitable result is a continuous accumulation of decision-making costs that ultimately outweigh any potential investment gains.
More critically, news information itself is inherently susceptible to manipulation and characterized by asymmetry. The market commentaries and strategic recommendations published daily by the research departments of major global investment banks, while ostensibly representing the findings of professional institutional research, often serve far more complex commercial agendas. The truth is that, even within these investment banks, the internal trading teams rarely base their operations on the views of their own firm's strategy analysts. These analysts are not positioned as market researchers in the true sense; rather, they serve as architects of the institution's brand image and magnets for attracting capital from large institutional clients. Their public pronouncements function primarily as marketing tools, designed to project an aura of professional authority and entice high-net-worth clients to entrust their funds to the various investment products managed by the bank. When the market collectively fixates on a renowned analyst's bullish or bearish stance, the underlying logic is often that the investment bank itself requires counterparty liquidity to execute a large-scale, contrarian trade it is about to undertake.
Consequently, long-term forex traders who possess true professional acumen must establish a rigorous mechanism for information isolation. The immediate volatility triggered by U.S. non-farm payroll data, the monthly shifts in European inflation metrics, or the impromptu remarks of Asian central bank officials—this relentless barrage of market noise can easily induce psychological overload and cognitive confusion in traders, thereby eroding confidence in their positions and triggering irrational decision-making. Likewise, expert interpretations and market forecasts disseminated across various media platforms should be systematically excluded from one's decision-making framework. Traders must clearly recognize that the dissemination channels for the vast majority of publicly available market analyses and trading recommendations are themselves meticulously engineered to serve the vested interests of the information source, rather than to facilitate the investment success of the recipient. When major investment banks broadcast bullish signals through their research channels, it often signifies that their proprietary trading desks are seeking opportunities to offload existing positions at market highs; conversely, when institutions collectively sound a bearish alarm regarding a specific currency pair, they are likely attempting to manufacture an atmosphere of market panic to facilitate the accumulation of positions at market lows. Given this structural conflict of interest, treating the strategic recommendations of mainstream institutions as contrarian indicators can, at times, provide a more accurate reflection of the market's actual capital flows.
Ultimately, the pinnacle of professionalism in long-term forex trading lies in an absolute conviction in—and rigorous adherence to—one's own trading system. A trading system that has been thoroughly validated against historical data, and is equipped with clear entry/exit rules and risk-control parameters, generates signals and alerts that constitute the *only* actionable guidance a trader should heed and follow. The true value of a trading system lies not in its ability to predict every single market fluctuation, but rather in providing the trader with an operational framework that effectively strips away emotional interference and helps navigate around cognitive pitfalls. The more a forex trader understands the market—and the more comprehensive they believe their grasp of available information to be—the more susceptible they become to the pitfalls of overconfidence and excessive trading, ultimately leading to significant financial losses. This is because the vast majority of publicly available market information consists of curated and processed content; its fundamental objective is to induce retail traders to act in accordance with the interests of the information providers, rather than to assist them in generating investment profits. The core competence of professional traders lies precisely in their profound insight into this mechanism of information manipulation, as well as the independent decision-making capabilities and systematic execution discipline built upon that insight.

In the professional practice of leveraged forex trading, traders must thoroughly discard erroneous psychological associations based on historical similarities; this constitutes the psychological cornerstone for constructing a stable and profitable trading system.

---

When executing trading decisions, many market participants often fall into a cognitive trap: they habitually force a comparison between current market movements and a past trade—recalled from memory—that bears a similar chart pattern. In doing so, they focus excessively on the ultimate outcome of that past trade rather than on the objective structural reality of the current market.
This mental rigidity is highly misleading: if a remembered past trade concluded with a significant rally, the trader falls victim to an "anchoring effect," subjectively assuming that the current market movement is bound to repeat that upward trajectory. Consequently, lacking confirmation from current market momentum, they blindly chase long positions—only to frequently encounter a trend reversal that leaves them deeply trapped in losing positions. Conversely, if a previous pattern of similar appearance ended in a sharp decline, the trader preemptively assumes the current market must also fall, leading them to open short positions prematurely against the prevailing trend—only to frequently miss out on the subsequent strong rebound. This "static-logic-in-a-dynamic-world" approach—akin to the fable of "marking the boat to find the sword"—fundamentally attempts to apply static past experiences to a dynamic market environment, inevitably resulting in distorted decision-making.
A core characteristic of the forex market is its dynamic evolutionary nature; macroeconomic fundamentals, capital flows, market sentiment, and micro-level order book structures undergo subtle shifts at every moment. This implies that absolutely no two trades in the market are ever truly identical; the formation of every single candlestick is a unique product of a specific moment in time and space. Therefore, mature forex traders must cultivate a rigorous "present-moment awareness." They must decisively sever the psychological chain that simplistically projects historical outcomes onto the future, thereby dispelling the illusion that one can predict the future merely by drawing analogies to the past. Only by independently evaluating each new trade—based strictly on current price action, technical signals, and risk management protocols—can traders seize the initiative within this inherently uncertain, two-sided market game and achieve robust, long-term capital appreciation.

---

• 
• 

---

13711580480@139.com

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

z.x.n@139.com

Mr. Z-X-N

China · Guangzhou

---