---

All the problems in forex short-term trading,
Have answers here!
All the troubles in forex long-term investment,
Have echoes here!
All the psychological doubts in forex investment,
Have empathy here!

---

In the realm of two-way trading within the foreign exchange market, traders who truly possess the capacity for sustained profitability often maintain a prudent distance from technical indicators. This choice is not accidental; rather, it stems from a profound understanding of the fundamental nature of market prices and an uncompromising pursuit of trading efficiency.

---

First and foremost, technical indicators inherently face an unavoidable dilemma regarding their parameters. Whether it involves setting the periods for moving averages or adjusting the thresholds for the Relative Strength Index (RSI), the selection of these parameters is often heavily subjective and lacks a rigorous foundation in mathematical derivation. In different market environments, the exact same set of parameters can generate vastly different trading signals; this lack of formulaic universality makes it difficult for technical indicators to serve as a stable and reliable basis for decision-making. More critically, technical indicators are, by their very nature, lagging feedback tools. They are derivative results—mathematical processed outputs—of historical price data; by the time an indicator generates a buy or sell signal, the actual market execution price has already shifted. In the foreign exchange market—where every second counts—this "half-step behind" reaction mechanism means that traders are perpetually chasing price movements that have already partially materialized, rather than capturing the true, real-time state of the market. In contrast, real-time execution prices convey information in the most direct and immediate manner possible; they require no intermediate conversion or calculation, thereby instantly reflecting the collective behavior and shifting sentiment of market participants.
Delving deep into the core drivers of market execution—and applying a "first principles" mindset—price undoubtedly occupies a supreme position. Price represents the ultimate distillation of all market information, the instantaneous manifestation of the power struggle between buyers and sellers, and the most authentic reflection of the direction of capital flows. In a market characterized by high liquidity and high volatility—such as foreign exchange—every tick of the price contains a wealth of market information; thus, a keen sensitivity to price movements—coupled with the ability to respond to them instantly—constitutes the core competitive advantage of a professional trader. Following closely behind price is trading volume. Although the foreign exchange market does not possess centralized, unified volume data in the same way that stock markets do, one can still gain insight into the intensity and persistence of capital inflows and outflows by observing the depth of quotes in the interbank market, the liquidity distribution within order books, and the volume references provided by brokers. Trading volume serves as the energetic underpinning for price movements; it validates the reliability of price trends, as price movements that lack the corroboration of corresponding volume often prove unsustainable. Regarding news reports and market information—while they play a significant role in the formation of long-term trends—they occupy a relatively secondary position at the actual level of trade execution. The market possesses astonishing foresight; a vast amount of information is often already reflected in price movements through the positioning of institutional capital *before* it is officially released. By the time the news is formally announced, the market may instead exhibit a "buy the rumor, sell the fact" reversal. At such moments, basing trading decisions solely on the news makes one highly susceptible to falling into the passive trap of chasing rallies and cutting losses—buying high and selling low.

In the complex environment of two-way forex trading, a trader's personality traits constitute one of the key variables determining their ability to generate consistent profits. There is no single, definitive answer to the question of which personality type is best suited for trading, as one's temperament is often inextricably linked to the specific strategic timeframes one chooses to employ.

---

Generally speaking, individuals with different personality traits may naturally gravitate toward—or be better suited for—different types of trading. For instance, a cautious, detail-oriented investor might find their rhythm more easily in short-term trading, which demands rapid reactions; conversely, a trader with a calm temperament and a long-term perspective might be better aligned with investment styles characterized by longer holding periods.
Due to its high-frequency entry and exit characteristics, short-term trading typically involves the use of relatively high leverage. While this amplifies potential returns, it is simultaneously accompanied by elevated risk. At the same time, its primary advantage lies in its low time cost: the efficacy of a trading strategy can be rapidly validated—and immediate feedback obtained—through changes in the account's equity within a relatively short timeframe.
In contrast, long-term trading involves extended holding periods, resulting in relatively smoother fluctuations in account equity and a generally more stable overall trajectory. However, its significant drawback is its high time cost; verifying whether a specific trading system possesses sustainable profitability requires enduring longer market cycles and exercising considerable patience.
Therefore, traders in the market should strive to identify trading methodologies that align harmoniously with their own innate personality traits, rather than attempting to forcibly contort their nature to fit a specific trading paradigm. Making choices that are in tune with one's natural disposition serves as the bedrock for achieving consistent, long-term profitability.
Crucially—regardless of whether one opts for a long-term or short-term approach—risk management remains the absolute lifeline of trading; it is an indispensable element that must never be overlooked. Traders should systematically compile statistics on—and conduct post-trade reviews of—their own trading styles, entry timing, holding periods, and profit/loss distributions. By doing so, they can deeply analyze the drawdown and growth characteristics of their equity curves and scientifically allocate their risk exposure. Only in this way can one gradually construct a personalized trading system that is logically consistent and capable of withstanding market scrutiny; this is the indispensable path to navigating market cycles and achieving the long-term appreciation of one's assets.

In the two-way trading environment of the forex market, the primary reason why the vast majority of traders ultimately find themselves in a losing position is not, in fact, a failure to recognize market trends. On the contrary, the core issue often lies in an excessive, almost superstitious adherence to the market consensus of "trading with the trend." These traders lack the patience and mental fortitude required to steadfastly maintain their positions while a trend is in motion; consequently, they exit the market prematurely during trend retracements, thereby missing out on the profit opportunities generated by the trend's continuation—or worse, they accumulate losses through frequent stop-outs.

---

A sound philosophy regarding position holding in forex trading can be interpreted through a logic that aligns more closely with actual market dynamics. The movement of a forex currency pair's trend is never a unidirectional, linear progression; rather, its trajectory mirrors the vicissitudes of life itself—featuring both smooth, open paths during favorable conditions and winding, arduous trials during adverse times. Just as achieving long-term life goals requires remaining true to one's original intent and persevering through adversity, capturing long-term profits from market trends in forex trading demands a similar mindset. When a currency pair's major trend is clearly advancing, one must calmly accept the interim retracements and corrections that inevitably occur. Provided that reasonable stop-loss safeguards are in place, traders should steadfastly maintain their positions, patiently waiting for temporary floating losses to gradually transform into floating profits. Subsequently, as the trend continues to unfold, one should continuously cycle through this position-holding logic to achieve a compounding growth of profits. It is crucial to clarify that the core principle of position holding in forex trading is *not* that one should hold a position "only when the market is moving in one's favor." Many traders are misled by this one-sided misconception. In reality, within the framework of a clearly defined trend, even if short-term counter-trend fluctuations occur—provided that the fundamental logic of the trend remains unbroken—one must continue to hold the position firmly to avoid having one's long-term trading rhythm disrupted by transient market noise. The trading philosophy of "riding the trend" often leads traders astray—largely because they are misled by metaphors that fail to accurately reflect the realities of the forex market. The most common of these analogies likens following a trend to the downstream flow of a mighty river, fostering the belief that once a trend takes shape, it will proceed unidirectionally without significant retracements. However, the dynamics of the forex market differ fundamentally from the flow of rivers. While a river certainly possesses a direction, it almost never experiences substantial, prolonged reversals capable of altering its overall course; even if brief eddies or backflows occur, their magnitude is negligible—too insignificant to exert any noticeable impact on the river's general direction. The movement of currency pair trends, conversely, is entirely different. Whether a trend is bullish or bearish, its progression is invariably accompanied by retracements and corrections of varying magnitudes and durations. This phenomenon is the product of a confluence of factors—including market volatility, the interplay of capital flows, and macroeconomic shifts—and constitutes an inevitable, normal aspect of trend dynamics. By overlooking this critical distinction and blindly applying the "downstream river" metaphor, traders risk panicking and exiting their positions prematurely during trend retracements, ultimately allowing potential profits to slip through their fingers.

In the world of two-way trading within the forex market, truly elite traders eventually come to realize a counter-intuitive truth: the highest realm of investment lies in *not* setting stop-losses. This is not an encouragement to blindly "hold onto losing positions" (or "carry trades") or to disregard risk; rather, it represents a profound cognitive restructuring regarding the very essence of stop-losses—a realization forged through the crucible of countless stop-outs and deep introspection.

---

When many forex traders first enter the market, they are invariably indoctrinated by various technical analysis courses with the mantra that "the stop-loss is your lifeline." Consequently, they strictly adhere to rigid rules, ensuring that no single loss exceeds a specific percentage of their account equity. However, the harsh reality is that their principal gradually erodes through a series of these "reasonable" stop-outs; their account equity curve resembles a slow, agonizing incision made by a dull blade, leaving them perpetually unable to find the gateway to consistent profitability. This painful experience compels them to ask: Is the stop-loss truly a protective mechanism, or is it merely another form of self-inflicted depletion?
A deeper analysis reveals that the vast majority of traders fundamentally misuse the stop-loss. Approximately ninety percent of market participants treat the stop-loss as a talisman for survival, mechanically setting a stop-loss point immediately after entering a trade, as if this defensive line could hermetically seal them off from all market risks. Yet, in practice, this approach is akin to "drinking poison to quench one's thirst"; frequent stop-outs cause the account to hemorrhage capital during volatile, choppy market conditions, trapping the trader in a vicious cycle of "stop-out—re-entry—stop-out." Consequently, they remain unable to cultivate a genuine understanding of the market's underlying dynamics. More critically, a stop-loss is, in essence, merely paying the price for a flawed entry decision. The very moment a trader establishes a long or short position at a specific price point—if their judgment has already diverged from the market's true trajectory—any subsequent stop-loss action serves only to determine the *magnitude* of the loss; it amounts to nothing more than paying a penalty for a hasty decision made earlier. Such *post-hoc* damage control can neither redeem the poor quality of the initial decision nor elevate the trader's cognitive proficiency.
True masters of the craft understand deeply that the outcome of a forex investment is determined *before* the trade is even executed. They invest immense energy into rigorous pre-trade research, conducting in-depth analyses of the currency pair's macroeconomic backdrop, central bank policy trajectories, geopolitical risks, and key technical support and resistance zones. They strike decisively only when their underlying rationale for buying is logically sound and their entry price offers a sufficient margin of safety. This approach—characterized by "buying the right asset at the right price"—allows their positions to naturally sidestep most potential crises right from inception, rendering passive defensive measures, such as reliance on stop-losses, entirely unnecessary. Their focus lies not on the flickering numbers on a price chart, but rather on the intrinsic value and long-term trajectory of the currency pairs they hold. In the forex market, as long as the fundamental support for a currency pair remains robust, short-term price fluctuations and drawdowns should not be interpreted as warning signs of risk; on the contrary, they present prime opportunities to add to positions at a discount and optimize one's average cost basis. Basing stop-loss criteria solely on price volatility—rather than on a fundamental assessment of value—is a practice that completely puts the cart before the horse.
Of course, eschewing stop-losses does not imply that one should never exit a position. The only instance where a stop-loss becomes absolutely imperative is when the fundamental logic underpinning the initial purchase collapses—for instance, if the economic competitiveness of the currency pair's issuing nation deteriorates sharply, or if a key fundamental assumption relied upon at the time of entry is subsequently proven false. Such a stop-loss serves as a timely correction of a cognitive error, rather than a passive reaction to mere price fluctuations.
It is crucial to clearly distinguish the fundamental divergence in stop-loss strategies between true investing and mere speculation. For speculators engaged in short-term forex trading—those attempting to capitalize on intraday volatility or short-term trend reversals—a stop-loss is indeed an indispensable safety belt. Since speculation is, by its very nature, a game of probabilities—essentially a wager on whether prices will rise or fall tomorrow—it demands strict discipline to mitigate the impact of any single failed trade. True investing behavior, however, operates on an entirely different premise; when a trader establishes a position based on in-depth research into a currency pair's long-term value, they should completely discard mechanical rules such as "exit if the price falls below a specific moving average" or "cut losses if the position drops by a certain percentage." In such cases, there is only one valid criterion for judging whether one is right or wrong: Does the currency pair's long-term trend remain positive, and does its fundamental support remain solid?
The psychological predicament in which many traders find themselves stems precisely from conflating these two distinct logics. They enter the market based on an investor's rationale—for instance, holding a bullish view on a currency pair's medium-to-long-term appreciation potential—yet proceed to manage their risk during the holding period using a speculator's rulebook, panicking and executing stop-losses at the slightest sign of a drawdown. This schizophrenic approach to trading results in the worst of both worlds: one fails to reap the trend-based dividends of long-term investment while simultaneously failing to maintain the disciplined edge required for short-term volatility. Ultimately, one ends up battered from both sides and suffering frequent losses. To preach the discipline of stop-losses while completely disregarding the core logic behind one's initial entry is the most pedantic practice in forex trading. The decision to execute a stop-loss—or not—should form a closed loop with the original rationale for entering the trade; it must not exist merely as an isolated, mechanical rule.

In the arena of two-way forex trading, the debate surrounding "stop-losses" has historically been the greatest obsession weighing on traders' minds—so much so that some even view it as the market's greatest scam and a foolish act of self-imposed limitation.

---

For many traders, setting a stop-loss often amounts to voluntarily paying a premium for potential risk in advance—a practice that, to some extent, curtails their potential for profit.
From a professional standpoint, if a trader can accurately grasp the market's macro trends and overall direction, the necessity of a stop-loss is significantly diminished. By employing a technical analysis system with a high win rate, traders are fully capable of anticipating major market movements. Even if they encounter temporary unrealized losses while holding a position, this is merely a normal phenomenon of market volatility; provided their directional judgment remains accurate, time will ultimately validate the value of their position, and the shift from loss to profit becomes merely a matter of time. However, human nature often compels traders to focus excessively on immediate gains and losses, making them unable to tolerate temporary drawdowns on their balance sheets—thereby preventing them from truly grasping the core essence of "trading with the trend."
Of course, the rules regarding stop-losses must be viewed dialectically, requiring a clear distinction between the differing trading logics of long-term versus short-term strategies. For ultra-long-term investors, their substantial capital and extended time horizons allow them to smooth out risk through a multitude of small-position allocations; this strategy is, in essence, a form of indirect risk management rather than a reliance on frequent stop-losses. Conversely, for the vast majority of short-term traders—who possess limited capital and are eager to make quick profits—blindly "holding on" to a losing position not only wastes valuable time but, should their directional judgment prove erroneous, often leads to financial catastrophe. In reality, those in the market who frequently discuss—and obsess over—stop-loss orders and specific stop-loss levels are, for the most part, short-term speculators. This demographic often struggles to survive in the market for any extended period; their eventual departure is merely a matter of time. Conversely, those who genuinely advocate the stance that "stop-losses are unnecessary" are—almost without exception—long-term investors possessing profound expertise. They employ a prudent strategy characterized by long-term allocation and light positioning, maintaining their holdings for periods ranging from three to five years, or even longer. Within this strategic framework, frequent stop-losses are simply unneeded; indeed, frequent stop-losses would fundamentally undermine the logic and patience required for long-term holding, thereby rendering the realization of compound asset growth impossible.

---

• 
• 

---

13711580480@139.com

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

z.x.n@139.com

Mr. Z-X-N

China · Guangzhou

---